Detail Viewer with custom component

[Abdulaziz A.]

Hi,

I have 2 questions.

1. The DetailViewer component has a target attribute for which I have specified as "javascript" and the type of the field is "link".

In the ListGridField of type "link" target as "javascirpt" then, when I click on the link in the UI then it calls my cellClick method where I could check the fieldName and then proceed with my functionality.

In DetailViewer component I need a similar functionality i.e., when the user clicks on the link, I need a javascript method to be called, instead of opening a URL.

2. I am using isc.TabSet in my application and the tabBarPosition is "left" and I have specified the title for it as "Documents". Now when I view that, only part of the title is visible. Can I increase the width of the tab Title? If yes please let me know how to do it. Below is the code for your reference

isc.TabSet.create({
    ID:"leftTabSet",
    tabBarPosition: "left",
    width: 400,
    height: 200,
    top: 250,
    tabs: [
        {title:"Documents",
         pane: isc.Img.create({autoDraw: false, width: 48, height: 48, src: "pieces/48/pawn_blue.png"})},
        {icon: "pieces/16/pawn_green.png", iconSize:16,
         pane: isc.Img.create({autoDraw: false, width: 48, height: 48, src: "pieces/48/pawn_green.png"})}
    ]
});

Please help me in both the queries.

Awaiting your reply.

For your information, we are using the below version of SmartClient:

Isomorphic SmartClient/SmartGWT Framework (v9.0p_2014-01-14/PowerEdition Deployment 2014-01-14)

Thanks in advance.

[Isomorphic]

1) No, that's not currently supported except in ListGrids - if you need it, consider feature sponsorship (http://smartclient.com/services/index.jsp#features)

2) see tabBarThickness

[Isomorphic]

Actually, we're going to go ahead and add this capability to linkItems in DetailViewers - no exact ETA, but we'll update here when it's available.

[Isomorphic]

For 1), we've now added this support - target: "javascript" will not navigate, but will call item.click() on the field instead.

You can try it out in builds dated April 30 and later.