FilterBuilder translation of BETWEEN and BETWEEN_INCLUSIVE operators is not working properly / 13.0-p20230315

[eliasbalasis]

To clarify, the display label in FilterBuilder seems to be the same for similar operators.
for example: both "between" and "iBeetween" operators display "between" as label in "FilterBuilder" on a numeric field.
similarly: both "betweenInclusive" and "iBeetweenInclusive" operators display "between (inclusive)" as label in "FilterBuilder" on a numeric field.

This is contrary to the mapping you provided and confused me, making me suspect that the choice of label displayed depends on the field type.

I was expecting different label for each operator regardless of field type.

I hope this explains my confusion.

It is worth mentioning that we are assigning specific operators to specific field types thus avoiding assignment of operators with same label but I believe it is worth raising the question either way.

[Isomorphic]

Can you clarify what the problem is here?

Bear in mind that, as far as descriptions intended for end users, there is an intentional design decision to keep it simple.

So what's the issue you have here: something is unclear to end users, or criteria descriptions are the same despite different operators, or something else?

Ideally, can you give a specific Criteria where the description seems off?

[eliasbalasis]

I can confirm that on 13.0-p20250430 the labels are the same for both the case matching and the case insensitive operators.

Label is "between" for "iBetween" operator
Label is "between (inclusive)" for both "iBetweenInclusive" operator

However:
Label is "between" for "between" operator
Label is "between (inclusive)" for both "betweenInclusive" operator

I am guessing the label is derived from a combination of both the operator and the field type.

[eliasbalasis]

I am afraid it is possible that we have misunderstood the relationship between "Label" and "OperatorId".
Let me check.

[Isomorphic]

To clarify, here are the operator labels and their matching operatorIds:

Label	OperatorId
between (inclusive)	iBetweenInclusive
between	iBetween
between (match case)	between
between (inclusive, matchcase)	betweenInclusive

Best Regards
Isomorphic Software

[eliasbalasis]

FYI
The problem is still present in 13.0-p20250430

[eliasbalasis]

FilterBuilder.getCriteria().asString() seems to be translating BETWEEN operator to IBETWEEN and BETWEEN_INCLUSIVE operator to IBETWEEN_INCLUSIVE for all field types, including TEXT.

This is quite unexpected and reproducible on 13.0-p20230315

Is this a bug or are we missing something?