Hi There,
This isn't really a question... more of an exciting observation.
I've been playing around with HTTP/2, and found that SmartGWT performance is given a huge improvement over HTTP 1.1.
The performance improvement on initial load times for my SmartGWT application is conservatively around 500%.
I strongly recommend that HTTP/2 is considered for all deployments when using SmartGWT (I assume this will apply to SmartClient too).
Regards,
Nick
This isn't really a question... more of an exciting observation.
I've been playing around with HTTP/2, and found that SmartGWT performance is given a huge improvement over HTTP 1.1.
The performance improvement on initial load times for my SmartGWT application is conservatively around 500%.
I strongly recommend that HTTP/2 is considered for all deployments when using SmartGWT (I assume this will apply to SmartClient too).
Regards,
Nick