2010-08-14_LGPL - regression: form.setValue triggers fetch if formatValue defined

[claudiobosticco]

Sorry, I have a regression problem but it was NOT what I previously posted.

I beg your pardon!

the real problem is printed in the IE6 stacktrace where I noticed this 'fetchMissingValueReply':

FormItem.fetchMissingValueReply(_1=>Obj, _2=>"Si segnala la seguente eccezione:<br>"nu..."[82], _3=>Obj)
[c]Class.fireCallback(_1=>Obj, _2=>"dsResponse,data,dsRequest", _3=>Array[3], _4=>[StaticTextItem ID:isc_StaticTextItem_36 name:simulate], _5=>undef) on [Class RestDataSource]
Class.fireCallback(_1=>Obj, _2=>"dsResponse,data,dsRequest", _3=>Array[3], _4=>undef)
DataSource.fireResponseCallbacks(_1=>Obj, _2=>Obj, _3=>Obj, _4=>Obj)
DataSource.$38b(_1=>Obj, _2=>Obj, _3=>Obj, _4=>Obj, _5=>Obj)
DataSource.$377(_1=>Obj, _2=>Array[1], _3=>Obj)
DataSource.$379(rpcResponse=>Obj, jsonText=>"{"response":{"data":"Si segnala la segue..."[217], rpcRequest=>Obj)
** recursed on [c]Class.fireCallback

the docs for FormItem.fetchMissingValues seem clear: but I have this problem on a
editorType: "StaticTextItem",
which doesn't have a displayField defined!
It has a formatValue defined (and if I comment it out the error disappears).

setting fetchMissingValues: false solved the problem for me.

I hope this is a correct test case which explains the issue: please modify sample SmartClient_Explorer.html#validationType as:
js tab:

isc.DynamicForm.create({
    ID: "boundForm",
    dataSource: "type"
});
isc.Button.create({
    top: 60,
    title: "set value",
    click: "boundForm.setValue('intField', 15)"
});

xml tab:

isc.RestDataSource.create({
    ID:"type",
    fields:{
        intField:{
            name:"intField",
            title:"Integer",
            type:"integer", 
            editorType: "StaticTextItem", 
            formatValue: "return value"
        }
    }
})

then click "set value" -> it fires a server fetch for the value

from SmartClient_SC_SNAPSHOT-2010-08-14_LGPL to SmartClient_SC_SNAPSHOT-2010-08-23_LGPL

IE6, Chrome 6, FF 3.6.8

[Isomorphic]

Hi Claudio
Thanks for bringing this to our attention - this should be resolved in the next nightly build

Regards
Isomorphic Software

[claudiobosticco]

yes, I can confirm that SmartClient_SC_SNAPSHOT-2010-08-24_LGPL solves the problem.