Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
Clear All
new posts

  • stonebranch2
    replied
    Just a quick follow-up on this thread.

    I did find a post we made quite some time ago where there was a batik dependency for chrome and ff.

    https://forums.smartclient.com/forum...broken?t=32196

    However, I did some testing where we export PDF (chart and listgrid), and all seems to be working fine after removing these dependencies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Isomorphic
    replied
    Sorry about the poor phrasing, we'll clarify the docs here.

    Export works in Edge without Batik.

    We think cross-domain images may still require Batik even in modern browsers, but we're checking on that.

    We have not tried newer versions of Batik but as long as basic compatibility has been maintained, we would not expect a problem. We use a fairly limited part of the Batik API.

    Leave a comment:


  • stonebranch2
    started a topic Batik operational dependencies

    Batik operational dependencies

    Hi Isomorphic,

    We are looking to either upgrade (batik-1.16). or drop these optional batik dependencies and want to confirm this statement is still accurate?

    If we drop them, will there be any problems with Microsoft Edge?

    If we upgrade them (batik-1.16), will they still be compatible?

    Thanks

    Optional Dependencies
    • batik-anim, batik-awt-util, batik-bridge, batik-css, batik-dom, batik-ext, batik-gvt, batik-parser, batik-script, batik-svg-dom, batik-util, batik-xml -

      These are all required to use RPCManager.exportImage(), or when using RPCManager.exportContent() to export a DrawPane or FacetChart only in IE8 or earlier, or if a DrawPane has a DrawImage which loads a cross-domain image.
    https://smartclient.com/smartgwt/jav...endencies.html
Working...
X